#1 - 2023-6-19 23:37
禁止左转 (百字内无法阐明概念默认念经人不懂)
视频谈话
主持人摘录的部分对话
transcript油管输出的语音识别文本,可能有误
主持人:Helen Lewis
嘉宾:Jordan Peterson
L: One of the things I want to come back to is this idea, you say it in the book, that there is masculine order and feminine chaos.
P: No, actually, I say that those are symbolic representations of the two things.
L: OK, so why then? Why is order necessarily masculine?
P: I think it’s because our primary social hierarchy structures are fundamentally masculine.
L: And that’s not the patriarchy?
P:Well, it’s not the modern idea of the patriarchy, that’s for sure.
L: That’s my idea of the patriarchy, which is a system of male dominance.
P:In what sense is our society male-dominated?
L: The vast majority of wealth is owned by men. Women do more unpaid labour...
P:That’s a very tiny proportion of men and a huge proportion of people who are seriously disaffected are men. Most people in prison are men. Most people who are on the street are men. Most victims of violent crime are men. Most people who commit suicide are men. Most people who die in wars are men. People who do worse in school are men. It’s like, where’s the dominance here, precisely?
L: But I can say equally that most rape victims are women. There are almost no women who rape men.
P:There’s an asymmetry in all sorts of places, but that doesn’t mean that Western culture is a male-dominated patriarchy. The fact that there are asymmetries has nothing to do with your basic argument. This is a trope that people just accept: “Western society is a male-dominated patriarchy.” It’s like, “No, it’s not. That’s not true.” And even if it has a patriarchal structure to some degree, the fundamental basis of that structure is not power, it’s competence. That’s why our society works.
以下为机翻
L: 我想回到的一个问题是这个概念,你在书中说,存在着男性的秩序和女性的混乱。
P: 不,实际上,我是说这些是两件事物的象征性表示。
L: 好的,那为什么呢?为什么秩序必然是男性的?
P: 我认为这是因为我们主要的社会层次结构基本上是男性的。
L: 那这不就是父权制吗?
P: 嗯,这肯定不是现代人对父权制的理解。
L: 这是我对父权制的理解,它是一种男性主导的体系。
P: 我们社会在何种意义上是由男性主导的?
L: 大部分财富都由男性拥有。女性做了更多的无偿劳动...
P: 那是极小比例的男性和极大比例的严重不满的人都是男性。大多数在监狱里的人是男性。大多数在街头的人是男性。大多数暴力犯罪的受害者是男性。大多数自杀的人是男性。大多数在战争中死亡的人是男性。在学校里表现较差的也是男性。我就在想,这里的主导在哪里?
L: 但我同样可以说,大多数强奸受害者是女性。几乎没有女性强奸男性。
P: 各种地方都存在不对称,但这并不意味着西方文化是男性主导的父权制。存在不对称性与你的基本论点无关。这是人们所接受的一种陈词滥调:“西方社会是男性主导的父权制。”就像,“不,它不是。这是不正确的。”即使它在某种程度上具有父权结构,那种结构的基本基础并非权力,而是能力。这就是我们的社会能够运作的原因。
#2 - 2023-6-20 01:13
这小组他妈的谁创立,初衷是什么?怎么越走越远了?现在连文章都变成链接了?
#2-1 - 2023-6-20 18:06
禁止左转
我附上谈话内容了
原教旨主义不可取
#3 - 2023-6-20 22:22
(百字内无法阐明概念默认念经人不懂)
针对这一段JP没展开说
L: OK, so why then? Why is order necessarily masculine?
P: I think it’s because our primary social hierarchy structures are fundamentally masculine.
JP在别的访谈中说过男性规则让男性控制于秩序下,而同样的规则对女性尤其是疯女人不适用。不能因为男性规则控制不了疯女人而否定女性可能存在的秩序,希望他能展开论证

采访并没有把这一段摘录完整:
what you're doing is you're taking a tiny substrata of hyper successful men and using that to represent the entire structure of the of western society there's nothing about that that's vaguely using that to represent the entire structure of the of western society there's nothing about that that's vaguely and you could say that with with perfect utility but that doesn't provide any evidence for the existence of a male-dominated patriarchy well that just means the terrible things happen to both genders which they certainly do
你正在做的是取一小部分极度成功的男性来代表整个西方社会的结构,这完全没有任何道理。你可以非常有力地这么说,但这并不提供任何证据来证明男性主导的父权制的存在。这只是意味着可怕的事情同样发生在两个性别上,这是肯定的。
#3-1 - 2023-6-21 20:27
禁止左转
针对masculine order and feminine chaos的回答可见其指代的东西与通常语境下不同,并不简单指向男人和女人。order / chaos似乎是西方概念的阴与阳
#4 - 2023-6-20 23:07
(在毁灭了吗?)
删除了回复
#5 - 2023-6-20 23:08
(在毁灭了吗?)
加油,下一个孙吧
#6 - 2024-4-25 14:39
(摸鱼的时候会看bangumi)
Jordan Peterson好火啊